Rhine model and Anglo-Saxon Model essay

Shareholder’ and ‘stakeholder’ models of corporate governance:

Rhine model and Anglo-Saxon Model

Name

Instructor

Institution

Course

Date

Rhine model and Anglo-Saxon Model

The corporate governance helps in the assessment of the different ways used in the guarding of the interests of the financiers. The states of Rhine model and Anglo-Saxon have different ways on how they deal with the creditors, lenders and investors. The corporate governance calls for the rules and practices that the board of directors can use for the assurance of accountability, transparency and fairness, (Koen, 2005).  The placement of the virtues helps in the assessment of the employee’s relation within the organization. The research will investigate the shareholder’ and ‘stakeholder’ models of corporate governance.  The assessment will assess the best model for handling the employment relationships. The similarities and differences of Anglo-Saxon and Rhine model will be assessed.

             The broad differences of the shareholder (Anglo-Saxon) model and stakeholder (Rhine model).   The efficiency, Voice and equity can help in the management of the different models.  The shareholder or Anglo-Saxon model is grounded on the fact offered for the system of the financial needs for the firms used for the fulfilling of requirements in the capital markets.  The model is considered outsider’s requirements.  The model will be able to focus on the presumption that the information will be able to flow from the relatively good and regulatory system needed for the ample disclosure of information. The model was grounded on the liquid stock of markets and diversification of portfolios, (Budd, 2004).  The contrast of the Anglo-Saxon Model is the stakeholder or insider model. The reliance of the representation of the specific interests is offered in the stakeholder’s model or Rhine Model.  The model is concerned with the insider requirements due to the state of disciplining and monitoring of the employees.  The management is disciplined through the changes in the capital or securities markets. The shareholding with cross-holdings among other issues forces the institutions to turn to banks rather than the capital markets for finance.

The demise of the central planning in the Soviet Union posed the ease of assessing the variant state of capitalist systems. The Rhine model was considered the most endearing aspect of the social market systems for the Western Europe.  The Rhine model of capitalism is placed in areas like Rhine model. The Rhine model was modified with the increased changes in the social market, (Budd, 2004). The Anglo-Saxon model has been modified to maintain the supply aid hegemony.  The Anglo-Saxon model has been identified in the state of assessing the clean Air Act, deposit insurance and social security.  The Anglo-Saxon model is presented in the preference for the private ownership and management of resource. The other disadvantage is based on the limitation of the governmental economic intervention for the short-term crisis or cyclical management. The large scale disparities will require the acceptance of the system and innovation of the strong.

             The Rhine Model offers to the government the ability to maintain the safety net for the companies in the market. The Anglo-Saxon model focuses on the capitalistic expressions affecting the state of being poor and the minimal state of managing the workings of the middle and working poor class.  The Rhine’s model allows the support of offering the generous welfare for systems on earth.  The substantial and wide range people can manage the performance of activities within the US.  Their posts can transfer the poverty rates for the people lower than those in the Anglo-Saxon Model.  The Anglo-Saxon Model is characterized with the provision of the substantially reduced subsidies for the children, households and healthcare. The Anglo-Saxon increases the amount taxed from the organization. The changes of the state of industry and macroeconomic policies offer the management of the explicit pursuance of the social justice and consideration of the interest affecting the broad range of stakeholders.

            The board of directors has changed from the metric of innovation, demography, globalization, communication and value changes, (Koen, 2005).  The comparative international corporate questions the differences in board of directors for the organizations in different countries.  The application of the comparison has aided the explanation and enhancement of understanding for the social phenomena.  The valuable tools for social scientific research have offered the assessment of the wisdom placed for the social scientific research, (Koen, 2005).  The subsidiaries have distinct behavioral patterns.  The issues of dignity, security, equity and freedom are expressed in the evaluation of the public discourse. The stakeholders work relation form an integral part in the assessment of the different processes for the analysis of activities, (Budd, 2004). The composition of the supervisory board varies for the Anglo-Saxon and Rhine model businesses. The Anglo-Saxon Model places the employees little employee’s representation in the composition of the supervisory board. The Rhine model businesses offer the employees a large representation or influence power for the composition of the supervisory board.  The issues of the composition for the board of management are another issue. The Rhine models are members of the board management and are not the members of the supervisory board.  The Anglo-Saxon businesses have the majority of the supervisory meeting the CEO. The head of the supervisory team and the CEO report to the board of directors. This offers the vivid assessment of the organizational operations.

            The corporate governance affects frequency of meetings.  The Rhine model businesses hold board directors meetings twice in the year.  The Rhine model businesses hold their meetings six times in the year. The differences make the Anglo-Saxon firms be more flexible in decision making than the Rhine model businesses.  The regulation is the other issue affecting the Rhine model and Anglo-Saxon firms.  The Rhine model businesses have a specific and clear legislation through the federal government. The Anglo-Saxon businesses are under the control of the individual states for the multiplicity of the legislation. The corporate governance systems for the Anglo-Saxon and Rhine model organization vary, (Budd, 2004). The two-tier system is placed in the Rhine model organizations. The Anglo-Saxon businesses uphold the one-tier system. The members of the supervisory board or the board of directors are on the assessment of the members of the board of management.  The corporate governance focus for the Rhine model is on the long-term wellbeing for the stakeholders and the organization. The Anglo-Saxon firms, on the other hand, are focused on the increasing of the shares of the shareholders.

             The maintenance of the voice, equity and efficiency within the organization will be dependent on the assessment of the international industrial relation. The human resource management practices can result in the creation of relations among the employees, trade unions and management.  The industrial relations of the employees help to govern the practices of the international business with the country’s rules. The relation amid the management of the multinational looks at the international relations of employees.  The relations influence the implementation and strategy formulation for the international business.  The industrial relations can be observed in the daily workings of the industries.  The different factors relating to the assessment of the industrial relations is seen to be the following.  The institutional factors can affect the state of the employee relations. The home and host government policies, voluntary courts, labor legislation, employee courts and collective agreement offered in the corporate governance affect the state of employee’s relation in the industrial relations. 

The other issue is on the economic factors. The capitalist and communist culture offers the assessment of the structure for the labor force and supply of the labor forces.  The technological factors allowed the assessment of the rationalization, computerization, and automation and information technology, (Budd, 2004). The issues affect the state of performing different activities within the corporate governance.  The political system of the country, the political ideologies, parties and achievement of policies can affect the management’s dealing with employees. The involvement into the trade unions will help in the management of the different tasks and requirements. The last factor affecting the employee relation is the governmental factors. The provision of the globalization policies allowed the generation of dynamic changes for Multinational companies. The tradition of the trade unions for the corporation can hinder the performance of different activities.

 The efficiency, Voice and equity can be offered through the management of the employment relationships.  The state of efficiency is offered through the need of profit maximization.  The efficiency is required to be considered for the assessment of the standard of the business performance. The management is required to consider the way they would use for the assessment and control of the scarce resources that capture the concerns of economic prosperity, competitiveness and productivity. Equity is concerned with the standard of treatment for the organization and individual. The equity can be offered in the management of fairness affecting the distribution of the economic rewards or the administration of the employment policies. The voice is concerned with the standard of the employees’ participation in the organization.  The voice assessment focuses on the ability of the employees to have a meaningful input to the workplace decisions.  The assessment of the three aspects will help in the evaluation of the dispute resolution within the different individuals and institutions in the organization.

The Human resource manager will be required to assess the dispute resolution system for the conservation of the scarce resources. The aspects of money and time are considered on efficiency, Voice and equity.  The efficiency placement of the Stakeholders and shareholders model will require the training of the best employees to foster productive services. The effective corporate governance of the shareholder model will be grounded on two pillars, (Budd, 2004).  The first issue will be the ability of the owners to monitor their profits when they require them.  The intervention of the operations for the management will be on the basis of the vigor for the market for corporate control.  The prevention of strikes should be a balance on the demand of the shareholders and the stakeholders.  The management of the institutions is required to be given autonomous control in the assessment of the managerial decision-making.  The cost for the management can be based on the suffering of the psychological costs and disruption of the social relations. The nonfinancial costs can affect or influence the organizational efficiency for individuals.

             The management will be required to offer equity in the evaluation of the equitable systems affecting the consistency in the judgment of the employee’s performance.  The objective based evidence should assess the state of controlling the effects of equity assessment. The equity will require the outcomes to offer the effective remedies for the evaluation of the violated rights. The international companies can be charged with the mandate of reconciling the employees for a neutral state in organizational politics,(Budd, 2004).  The management’s equitability should be upon the control of the ability to appeal to the individual participants with privacy, sensitivity and respect.  The equity will help in the control of the existence of safeguards upon the members of the organization. The management should offer the widespread coverage for the assessment of the independent expertise or resources. The national origin, race, gender and personal characteristics should not be sited as a prejudice for of appreciating employees.

             The other issue is the management of voice. The aspect of voice can be seen in the overall corporate governance of the organization. The voice aspect focuses on the individuals influencing the direction of the organization. The managers are required to consider the stakeholders of the organization in different institutional requirements. The financiers, the community, the government, the stakeholders, the customers and financiers are the different people needed to be considered in the evaluation.  The board of directors can ensure compliance level for the authorization of the different ways of holding the collective bargaining.  The board of directors of the merger and acquisition of different organizations express the relevant stages corporate governance of the board of directors.  The domination of the liberal market offers the assessment of the economic efficiency, competitive markets and shareholder wealth assessment.

            The analysis of the two models posts the following facts.   The Rhine model is concerned with the requirements of all the stakeholders. On the other hand, Anglo-Saxon model focuses on the increase of the shareholder’s value. The Anglo-Saxon model is grounded on the activities occurring in the liquid capital markets, (Budd, 2004). The focus increases the state of capitalism and reduces the ability of the firm to handle the offering of organizational welfare. The Rhine’s model is grounded on the debt finance and bank finances.  The corollary shares are immensely dispersed for the Anglo-Saxon Model. The concentration is also offered in the Rhine’s Model.  The relations between the management and the stakeholders will be on the arm’s length operations for Anglo-Saxon model. The Rhine’s model focuses on the building of the long-term requirements and the building of trust for the employees and the management. Anglo-Saxon model uses the corporate control offered by the market. The approach is through the supervisory board of the bank. The corporate law will demand the use of a solitary board for the first model and the dual board for the Rhine’s model.

The Rhine model organizations uphold the presentation of the ways where the workers are not able to assess the motivational styles for the board of directors. The corporate governance focuses on the assessment of the positive workers feeling. The focus on relationship and leadership form the centerpiece for the stakeholder’s motivation.  The board of directors considered the change to be a threat when placed from the subordinates, (Lansbury, 2004).  The stakeholders seek the attention of the supervisors in order to address the changes they desire. The improvement of the quality is through the identification of the personal stakes for achieving individual achievements.

The Anglo-Saxon firms are seen to focus on the imposition of the short-term requirements for the assessment of the industrial relations of the deregulated labor of markets.  The Rhine model firm’s focus on the offering of the approaches controlled by the centralized approaches offered in the assessment of activities.  The inter-company systems for Anglo-Saxon are imposed for the offering of strong competition, (Albert, 1993). The strong competitions of the organization are based on the assessment of the activities of limiting the possible cooperation’s between the companies. The discouragement of the stakeholder representation is based on the assessment of the companies having the weak union requirements. The individuals are able to assess the facilitation of the unilateral control of the top board of directors.

In conclusion, Rhine model will foster good employee’s relation. The Rhine model can be considered the profitable approach that can be implemented in the management of the employees. The model reduces the profitability of the organization through the collection of welfare but reduces the access of the approaches for the assessment of the different tasks.  The Anglo-Saxon focuses on the increase of the profitability of the stakeholders. The reduction of the social welfares will reduce the good understanding between the management and the employees.

Reference

Albert, M. (1993) Capitalism vs. Capitalism, New York: Four Wall Eight Windows. Chapter 6: The Other Capitalism, pp. 99-126, and Chapter 7: The Economic Superiority of the Rhine Model, pp. 127-146. 

Budd, J. W. (2004) Achieving Decent Work by Giving Employment a Human Face. Geneva: ILO

Koen, C. I. (2005) Comparative International Management, London: McGraw-Hill. Chapter 1: Introduction to the Approaches to Comparative International Management (pp 2-24).

Koen, C. I. (2005) ‘Comparative Corporate Governance’ (Chapter 6, pp. 254-297) in Koen, C. I. (ED) Comparative International Management, London: McGraw-Hill.

Lansbury, R. N. (2004) ‘Introduction’ (Chapter 1 pp. 1-35), in Bamber, G. J.; Lansbury, R. D.; and Wailes, N. (EDS) International and Comparative Employment Relations: Globalisation and the Developed Market Economies. London: Sage.